| dc.description |
The study investigates the impact of the ignoring of grammarians to the non-common languages by which some readings of the Holy Quran have come. This led the readers to commit some mistakes and directed the readings according to the measure they put and the dialects they ignored. The study reviewed some of the readings that were not documented by the grammarians and they didn't accept their languages. They attributed the differences of grammatical rules which have come in these readings to the necessity, because the grammarians put their bases on minor and incomplete measure that did not include all Arabic dialects, in particular that came in the readings of the Holy Quran. This has caused a confusion and multiplicity in the same issue, as well as the impact of the ignoring of grammarians to the dialects of some tribes that came in the readings of the Holy Quran, in addition to the interpretation and remote explanations that deeply sunken in philosophy and imagination with the existence of linguistic phenomena that were built on a social and unrealistic base.
The study has come to the following findings and recommendations:
* In their accusing of readers of the Holy Quran, grammarians relied on the rules that they put and the grammar that they established such as the measurement and Reasoning. So, the Holy Quran and what was heard from the Arabs must be the origin of rulemaking, and away from the interpretations, philosophy and dystrophic or affectation.
* The grammarians ignoring of the dialects of some Arab tribes led to the interpretation of the readings and considered them wrong and anomaly readings, which was a cause of the trouble and plurality of grammatical opinions. So, attention should be given to the study of Arabic dialects, especially what ignored by
grammarians. |
en_US |